Effects of Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation on Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions From Rice Fields: A Meta‐Analysis

Le résumé fourni par la source

ABSTRACT Reducing water input and promoting water productivity in rice field under alternate wetting and drying irrigation (AWD), instead of continuous flooding (CF), are vital due to increasing irrigation water scarcity. However, it is also important to understand how methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions and global warming potential ( of CH 4 and N 2 O) respond to AWD under the influence of various factors. Here, we conducted a meta‐analysis to investigate the impact of AWD on CH 4 and N 2 O emissions and , and its modification by climate conditions, soil properties, and management practices. Overall, compared to CF, AWD significantly reduced CH 4 emissions by 51.6% and by 46.9%, while increased N 2 O emissions by 44.0%. The effect of AWD on CH 4 emissions was significantly modified by soil drying level, the number of drying events, mean annual precipitation (MAP), soil organic carbon content (SOC), growth cycle, and nitrogen fertilizer (N) application. Regarding N 2 O emissions, mean annual temperature (MAT), elevation, soil texture, and soil pH had significant impacts on the AWD effect. Consequently, the under AWD was altered by soil drying level, soil pH, and growth cycle. Additionally, we found that MAP or MAT can be used to accurately assess the changes of global or national CH 4 and N 2 O emissions under mild AWD. Moreover, increasing SOC, but not N application, is a potential strategy to further reduce CH 4 emissions under (mild) AWD, since no difference was found between application of 60–120 and > 120 kg N ha −1 . Furthermore, the soil pH can serve as an indicator to assess the reduction of under (mild) AWD as indicated by a significant linear correlation between them. These findings can provide valuable data support for accurate evaluation of non‐CO 2 greenhouse gas emissions reduction in rice fields under large‐scale promotion of AWD in the future.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.