Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis elicits diverse antibody responses to key vaccine antigens influenced by the imprint of past infections
Résumé fourni par la source
Knowledge gaps regarding human immunity to Streptococcus pyogenes have impeded vaccine development. To address these gaps and evaluate vaccine candidates, we established a human challenge model of S. pyogenes pharyngitis. Here, we analyse antibody responses in serum and saliva against 19 antigens to identify characteristics distinguishing 19 participants who developed pharyngitis and 6 who did not. We show that pharyngitis elicits serum IgG responses to key vaccine antigens and a muted mucosal IgA response, whereas IgG responses are minimal and IgA responses more pronounced in participants without pharyngitis. Serum IgG responses to pharyngitis in adult participants resemble those in children and are inversely correlated with the magnitude of pre-existing responses. While a straightforward correlate of protection is not evident, baseline antibody signatures distinguish clinical and immunological outcomes following experimental challenge. This highlights the influence of a complex humoral imprint from previous exposure, relevant for interpreting immunogenicity in forthcoming vaccine trials. Streptococcus pyogenes is a deadly bacteria without a vaccine. Here, researchers measured antibodies in serum and saliva from a strep throat human challenge trial. Baseline antibodies led to variable responses and affected susceptibility to strep throat.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis elicits diverse antibody responses to key vaccine antigens influenced by the imprint of past infections
- Date Crossref
- 03/12/2024
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.