Psychosis and the self: How spontaneous discussions of subjective experiences compare in the clinical high-risk and first-episode psychosis populations.
Rattachement africain : us, au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: Prior qualitative studies show that individuals with psychoticlike experiences express difficulties concerning their identity. However, previous work has studied individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR) and individuals with first-episode psychosis (FEP) separately. Here, we compare the experiences of individuals at CHR, individuals with FEP, and healthy individuals. METHODS: = 21.1 ± 2.8). Participants completed 30-45-min open-ended interviews. Trained research staff reviewed interview transcripts and conducted an iterative thematic analysis to identify major themes. RESULTS: = .02. All groups endorsed essentialist beliefs: CHR (31%), FEP (43%), and healthy controls (44%). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Individuals at CHR and with FEP spontaneously discuss issues related to their identities in ways that are informed and shaped by the social milieu. The bidirectional nature of these struggles reinforces a need for integrated care through psychiatric rehabilitation, with a specific focus on identity development. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Psychosis and the self: How spontaneous discussions of subjective experiences compare in the clinical high-risk and first-episode psychosis populations.
- Date Crossref
- 01/03/2025
- Éditeur
- American Psychological Association (APA)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.