A Rare Case of Early Left Ventricular Thrombus Development After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unstable Angina Pectoris With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Left ventricular (LV) thrombus is a serious complication of myocardial infarction (MI) that can lead to a fetal systemic embolism. Although coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) after MI is widely performed, to our knowledge, there are no reports of LV thrombus in the early postoperative period. Here, we report a rare case of a 70-year-old man who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) for unstable angina pectoris with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). An LV thrombus (13 mm × 12 mm) was incidentally discovered on an echocardiography 7 days after OPCAB. We administered an oral anticoagulant (OAC) and observed resolution of the thrombus five months post-surgery. In the present case, factors such as low LVEF, infarcted lesion at the apex, and hypercoagulable state due to systemic inflammation after CABG likely contributed to LV thrombus development. This case highlights that LV thrombus is a potential complication early after CABG; thus, careful follow-up is required during the early postoperative period. Prophylactic anticoagulant administration in the early postoperative period should be considered for patients at particularly high risk for LV thrombus.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Rare Case of Early Left Ventricular Thrombus Development After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unstable Angina Pectoris With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2024
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.