A simple technique to improve docking time in robotic surgery
Rattachement africain : il. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The docking process is a crucial step in robotic surgery, which determines the technical capability of moving the robotic arms during surgery and affects the performance of surgery. Robotic companies, therefore, provide setup guides recommending the trocar placement, arm carts, and operating table positioning for each procedure or body quadrant, to facilitate this process. This process takes time and although improves with experience, reported docking times range from 4 to 29 min. The final step of docking the robot is sometimes challenging and includes the insertion of the robotic instruments into the surgical field which involve patient safety. We implemented a simple new technique for safe insertion of robotic instruments and overcome the challenge of manipulating the camera arm for visualizing the trocars and advancing of the robotic instruments into the surgical field. This technique utilizes simple laparoscopic skills of laparoscopic instrument insertion. Docking times were recorded in ten consecutive patients undergoing robotic surgeries with the Hugo RAS™ and compared to our prospectively collected data registry prior to this technique. The new technique reduced the average docking time by 3.5 min and resulted in improvement of 45% in docking time. Integrating trivial laparoscopic skills into the docking process may simplify and reduce the docking time in robotic surgery.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A simple technique to improve docking time in robotic surgery
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2024
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.