uORF-targeting steric block antisense oligonucleotides do not reproducibly increase RNASEH1 expression
Rattachement africain : gb, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Upstream open reading frames (uORFs) are cis -regulatory motifs that are predicted to occur in the 5′ UTRs of the majority of human protein-coding transcripts and are typically associated with translational repression of the downstream primary open reading frame (pORF). Interference with uORF activity provides a potential mechanism for targeted upregulation of the expression of specific transcripts. It was previously reported that steric block antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) can bind to and mask uORF start codons to inhibit translation initiation, and thereby disrupt uORF-mediated gene regulation. Given the relative maturity of the oligonucleotide field, such a uORF blocking mechanism might have widespread therapeutic utility. Here, we re-synthesized three of the most potent ASOs targeting the RNASEH1 uORF described in a study by Liang et al. and investigated their potential for RNASEH1 protein upregulation, with care taken to replicate the conditions of the original study. No upregulation (of endogenous or reporter protein expression) was observed with any of the oligonucleotides tested at doses ranging from 25 to 300 nM. Conversely, we observed downregulation of expression in some instances. We conclude that previously described RNASEH1 uORF-targeting steric block ASOs are incapable of upregulating pORF protein expression in our hands.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- uORF-targeting steric block antisense oligonucleotides do not reproducibly increase RNASEH1 expression
- Date Crossref
- 01/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.