Outcomes of mitral valve transcatheter edge to edge repair in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion
Résumé fourni par la source
Introduction It remains unknown whether the concomitant coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) would affect the outcomes of the Mitral valve Trans-catheter Edge to edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) procedure.Methodology Study population was extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Data using the International Classification of Diseases and clinical modifications/procedure coding system codes for M-TEER and CTO. Primary outcomes were in-hospital all-cause mortality and net cardiac periprocedural complications. Propensity matching was used to extract a matched control (M-TEER-CTO and M-TEER-No CTO).Results A total of 48,835 cases of M-TEER were identified in the United States between January 2016 and December 2020, of whom 700 patients (1.5%) had the diagnosis of coronary total occlusion (CTO). The mean age of M-TEER patients was not significantly different between the two groups (76 vs. 75 years, p = 0.11); however, the CTO cohort had a higher percentage of males (66.72% vs. 53.41%, p = 0.002). M-TEER-CTO had higher odds of net all cardiac periprocedural complications (aOR 1.83,95% CI (1.17–2.84), p = 0.007) compared to the no-CTO group, however, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.54, 95%CI (0.52–4.56), p = 0.43)Conclusions Patients undergoing M-TEER with CTO had a higher incidence of net all cardiac periprocedural complications but similar mortality compared to those with no CTO.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Outcomes of mitral valve transcatheter edge to edge repair in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion
- Date Crossref
- 27/11/2024
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.