Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 article

Comparison of a Fully Angiography‐Derived Versus a Hybrid of Angiography and Pressure‐Wire‐Derived Approach to Assess Coronary Microvascular Resistance: The Oxford Acute Myocardial Infarction Hybrid (OxAMI‐HYBRID) Study

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb, it, cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

ABSTRACT Background Despite growing evidence of its clinical implications, assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) remains limited in routine clinical practice. Hence, there is an increasing interest in angiography‐derived indices to encourage assessment of CMD in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Aims We investigate here an alternative approach, using a combination of pressure‐wire‐based assessment of distal coronary pressure (P d ) and an angiography‐derived surrogate of coronary flow, to derive a hybrid index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR hybrid ). Methods Patients enroled prospectively under the Oxford Acute Myocardial Infarction (OxAMI) study were included in the OxAMI HYBRID substudy. The accuracy of IMR hybrid was assessed in diagnosing CMD using bolus thermodilution‐based Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR) as a reference. The accuracy of IMR hybrid was then compared against a fully angiography‐derived index of microvascular resistance (IMR angio ). Results One hundred and eighty six patients were enroled, of which 121 with acute coronary syndrome and 65 with stable coronary artery disease. A total of 240 vessel analyses were performed. Both IMR hybrid and IMR angio correlated with IMR (rho = 0.71, p < 0.001 and rho = 0.71, p < 0.001 respectively) and showed good and comparable overall diagnostic accuracy in predicting IMR ≥ 25 (80.8% and 83.1% respectively) with a receiver operator curve (ROC) analyses showing similar AUC of 0.86 (95% CI 0.82–0.91, p < 0.001) for IMR hybrid and 0.86 (95% CI 0.809–0.906, p < 0.001) for IMR angio , p for comparison = 0.641. Conclusion Both approaches, IMR hybrid and IMR angio are viable and comparable indices correlating with bolus thermodilution‐based IMR and retaining good diagnostic accuracy. IMR hybrid specifically is a simple alternative to conventional bolus thermodilution‐based IMR applicable to any pressure wire system.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comparison of a Fully Angiography‐Derived Versus a Hybrid of Angiography and Pressure‐Wire‐Derived Approach to Assess Coronary Microvascular Resistance: The Oxford Acute Myocardial Infarction Hybrid (OxAMI‐HYBRID) Study
Date Crossref
24/11/2024
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Coronary Interventions and DiagnosticsCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.