Effect of therapeutic erythrocytapheresis on outcomes and renal benefit in patients with high-altitude polycythemia: a real-world study
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Kidney injury from high-altitude polycythemia (HAPC) is common, yet few studies have explored effective treatments. This research assessed the renal benefits of therapeutic erythrocytapheresis (TE) in HAPC patients, analyzing the efficacy of single versus multiple treatments. From 2017 to 2023, 631 patients undergoing TE were included. Findings showed notable improvements in hemoglobin levels (median: 228.00 vs. 169.00 g/L, p < 0.001), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (median: 100.24 vs. 105.92 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , p < 0.001), and uric acid levels (median 495.00 vs. 405.00 µmol/L, p < 0.001). The rate of patients with negative urine protein tests rose from 54.58 to 92.83%. Analysis indicated that a lower pre-treatment eGFR was associated with significant renal improvement post-treatment (OR 0.959, 95% CI 0.945–0.972, p < 0.001), even when adjusting for hemoglobin and other factors (OR 0.962, 95% CI 0.947–0.977, p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, 168 patients were categorized based on the number of treatments. Compared to single treatment, multiple treatments resulted in significantly lower hemoglobin levels post-treatment (median: 177.00 vs. 165.00 g/L, p < 0.001). TE proves to be a beneficial treatment for HAPC, improving hemoglobin and renal function. Multiple treatments may be preferable for maintaining stable hemoglobin levels.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Effect of therapeutic erythrocytapheresis on outcomes and renal benefit in patients with high-altitude polycythemia: a real-world study
- Date Crossref
- 23/11/2024
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.