Focal therapy using high-intensity focused ultrasound with intraoperative prostate compression for patients with localized prostate cancer: a multi-center prospective study with 7 year experience

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: To evaluate clinical outcomes of focal therapy using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with intraoperative prostate compression for patients with localized prostate cancer (PC). METHODS: Patients were included if they had prostate specific antigen levels of ≤20 ng/mL and clinically significant PC (CSPC) within the left or right half, or upper or lower half of the prostate. CSPC was detected using magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided target biopsy and a 12-core systematic biopsy. Focal therapy using HIFU with intraoperative prostate compression was administered to lesions visible on the magnetic resonance imaging. Biochemical failure was defined by the Phoenix ASTRO definition. Pathological failure was defined as having CSPC in the biopsy at the time of biochemical failure. RESULTS: The patients (n = 240; median age, 69 years old; median prostate specific antigen level, 6.42 ng/mL) were divided according to the D'Amico risk classification into: 'low' (n = 51), 'intermediate' (n = 107), and 'high' (n = 82) groups. The biochemical and the pathological disease-free survival rates after a single treatment for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 93.7% and 92.2%, 88.5% and 91.6%, and 84.8% and 86.6%, respectively. The radical or systematic treatment-free survival rates were 96.1%, 94.4%, and 95.1%, respectively. Median follow-up period was 48 months (range 24-84). The urinary and sexual function at 1 month post-treatment had deteriorated but returned to preoperative levels at 3 or 6 months after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Focal therapy using HIFU with intraoperative prostate compression would improve medium-term oncological outcomes without the risk of functional deterioration.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.