Proteogenomic analysis reveals non-small cell lung cancer subtypes predicting chromosome instability, and tumor microenvironment
Rattachement africain : kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is histologically classified into lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). However, some tumors are histologically ambiguous and other pathophysiological features or microenvironmental factors may be more prominent. Here we report integrative multiomics analyses using data for 229 patients from a Korean NSCLC cohort and 462 patients from previous multiomics studies. Histological examination reveals five molecular subtypes, one of which is a NSCLC subtype with PI3K-Akt pathway upregulation, showing a high proportion of metastasis and poor survival outcomes regardless of any specific NSCLC histology. Proliferative subtypes are present in LUAD and LSCC, which show strong associations with whole genome doubling (WGD) events. Comprehensive characterization of the immune microenvironment reveals various immune cell compositions and neoantigen loads across molecular subtypes, which predicting different prognoses. Immunological subtypes exhibit a hot tumor-enriched state and a higher efficacy of adjuvant therapy. Subtyping of non-small cell lung cancer can be challenging based on pathology. Here, the authors utilise multi-omics analysis of 229 patients to identify further subtypes, and altered immune composition between subtypes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Proteogenomic analysis reveals non-small cell lung cancer subtypes predicting chromosome instability, and tumor microenvironment
- Date Crossref
- 23/11/2024
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.