Protein Purification Using Chitosan‐Modified Polyacrylonitrile Membranes
Résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Protein purification is essential for biomedical and industrial applications, but current methods often face challenges like low efficiency, high cost, and limited selectivity. To overcome these drawbacks, we developed electrospun polyacrylonitrile (PAN) membranes with chitosan (Cs) and evaluated their ability to capture bovine serum albumin (BSA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) from aqueous solutions. Comparing PAN/Cs and pristine PAN membranes, we showed Cs significantly enhances BSA adsorption. The membranes were characterized using scanning electron microscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, tensile testing, surface area analysis, energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy, and contact angle measurements. PAN/Cs membranes exhibited smooth, uniform fibers averaging 0.454 μm in diameter. The maximum BSA adsorption capacity () was 75.61 mg g−1 for PAN/Cs and 21.17 mg g−1 for PAN, while for IgG, was 28.83 mg g−1 for PAN/Cs and 19.77 mg g−1 for PAN. SDS‐PAGE electrophoresis confirmed that the eluted proteins maintained their quality and integrity. Elution efficiency of PAN/Cs membranes reached 89.13% for BSA and 62.16% for IgG. Additionally, PAN/Cs membranes selectively captured BSA and IgG when co‐dissolved in aqueous solutions. These results position PAN/Cs electrospun membranes as promising materials for efficient, cost‐effective, and selective protein purification, with potential applications in both biomedical and industrial fields.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Protein Purification Using Chitosan‐Modified Polyacrylonitrile Membranes
- Date Crossref
- 20/11/2024
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.