Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 article

Investigating technological processing supporting the assessment of novel proteins in food and feed risk assessment

6Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract The safety of novel proteins is routinely evaluated in various regulated areas of the food and feed chain, including genetically modified (GM) crops and novel foods (NFs). This project aimed to map the food and feed products containing protein from the main GM crops, relevant food categories falling under the NF Regulation, and unconventional feed, together with their production processes and to discuss the effect of the mapped processes on the safety of the corresponding novel proteins. A scoping literature review (1,325 documents included), an open online survey and a stakeholder workshop were the basis to build up the mappings for products and processes, also including operational conditions for each processing step. In the case of crops, the information gathered also helped identify more than 40 products, and the corresponding production processes, not included in the OECD consensus documents for compositional considerations of GM crops. Moreover, a systematic literature review (154 documents included), carried out within the project, assisted in the identification of the available evidence on the impact of processing on protein safety. Overall, certain processes, such as thermal treatments, fermentation, or enzymatic hydrolysis, significantly enhanced protein digestibility across various food/feed matrices. Similarly, fermentation, ensiling, and extraction processes have been shown to improve nutritional properties in various products. The data collected seemed to indicate that heating can effectively reduce the activity of NEPs from GM crops and that heating and enzymatic hydrolysis can reduce IgE reactivity for certain proteins and operational conditions. However, exceptions to these trends were also reported in the literature, and in certain cases (e.g., impact on gut microbiota), the evidence gathered was insufficient to draw substantiated conclusions. This project also contributed to identify existing knowledge gaps and research needs towards regulatory risk assessment of food and feed products containing protein.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Investigating technological processing supporting the assessment of novel proteins in food and feed risk assessment
Date Crossref
01/11/2024
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Universidad de Zaragoza pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Universidad de Zaragoza et Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchTransgenic Plants and Applications

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.