Discussing poverty within primary care consultations: implications for mental health support
Rattachement africain : gb, at. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Poverty can have significant impacts on health and wellbeing. However, asking patients about their broader socioeconomic circumstances is not routine within primary care consultations. AIM: To understand healthcare professionals' experiences of communicating with patients about their socioeconomic circumstances and how a bespoke training programme supported these conversations in routine consultations. DESIGN & SETTING: Healthcare professionals from 30 GP practices across England received training to improve understanding and communication with patients about the ways that poverty impacted their mental health. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 49 GPs and allied health professionals to understand barriers and enablers to communication around poverty and the impact of the training on their consultation practice. RESULTS: Health professionals often lacked confidence in discussing socioeconomic issues and welcomed information on how to do this sensitively. Asking questions about poverty-related stresses was felt to lead to better understanding of the causes of mental distress, avoidance of problematic assumptions and inappropriate antidepressant prescribing, and to enable more coordinated and appropriate support from practice teams. CONCLUSION: Asking patients about their socioeconomic circumstances can facilitate provision of appropriate support.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Discussing poverty within primary care consultations: implications for mental health support
- Date Crossref
- 20/11/2024
- Éditeur
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.