Red Scalp Disease: An Underdiagnosed Entity
Rattachement africain : mx. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Red scalp disease or scalp rosacea, an inflammatory dermatosis, is frequently misdiagnosed as scarring alopecia due to nonspecific trichoscopic findings and limited case reports. While facial rosacea is well-documented, rosacea affecting extrafacial sites, such as the scalp, remains underrecognized. Accurate diagnosis is crucial to avoid unnecessary treatments and to establish an appropriate prognosis. Case Report: A 70-year-old male with an asymptomatic red scalp for 1 year, unresponsive to topical treatments, presented to our clinic. Examination revealed diffuse erythema with papules and pustules. Trichoscopy showed vascular polygons, "caterpillar hair" vessels, linear arterial branching, and hairpin vessels. Diagnosis of scalp rosacea was made, and significant improvement was observed after 2 months of oral tetracycline therapy. Discussion/Conclusion: Red scalp disease is characterized by diffuse erythema, inflammatory lesions, and vascular changes. Patients often exhibit mild facial photosensitivity but may not show prominent facial rosacea symptoms. Distinct trichoscopic patterns can assist in accurate diagnosis. Early recognition and treatment with systemic antibiotics, such as tetracyclines, are crucial to prevent progression to more severe inflammation. Increased awareness among dermatologists and trichologists is essential to enhance the diagnosis and management of this condition.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Red Scalp Disease: An Underdiagnosed Entity
- Date Crossref
- 19/11/2024
- Éditeur
- S. Karger AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.