Analysis of medico-legal claims related to deliveries: Caesarean section vs. vaginal delivery

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: The Iranian National Health Service (NHS) suggested that gynecologists face a higher risk of medicolegal claims, with a significant number of claims being related to delivery events. This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with delivery related claims. METHOD: In this cross-sectional study, we conducted an analysis of medico-legal documents which related to complications during delivery events and presented to Iranian Medical Legal Organization spanning from March 2018 to February 2020. A total of 227 legal prosecutions that were initiated by patients or, in cases where that wasn't possible, by their families, were included in the study and all of them were evaluated in commission with experienced professionals. The data collection phase occurred between February 2023 and May 2023. The collected data encompassed various aspects, including patient characteristics mode of delivery, reasons for claims, hospital type, accused party, the occurrence of instrumental delivery and the final disposition of the claims (paid claims or closed claims). Paid claims represent successful lawsuits where the healthcare provider or their insurer made a financial settlement to the patient. Closed claims encompass those that were either denied or dismissed. Chi-square or t-tests were employed to compare factors between paid claims and closed claims. RESULT: In this study, it was observed that vaginal delivery was performed in 51.1% of the claims, whereas 48.9% underwent a caesarean section.. Approximately half of the claims were against obstetrician-gynecologists, and 33% of the claims against other providers were against midwives.. The majority of complaints were related to perinatal mortality (34.8%) and neonatal asphyxia (18.5%). In 58.1% of cases, no malpractice was identified, while 41.9% resulted in paid claims. Also, there were no significant differences between the paid claims and closed claims groups in several factors, such as the type of hospital (P = 0.904), maternal age (P = 0.157), type of delivery (P = 0.080), and accused party (P = 0.168). However, the number of instrumental deliveries (13.8% of vaginal deliveries) and the reasons for claims, exhibited significant differences between the two claims (P = 0.021, P<0.001 respectively). CONCLUSION: This study found that maternal complications were more common in caesarean sections, while neonatal claims were more prevalent in vaginal deliveries. The study recommended public health interventions to reduce the overall prevalence of delivery-related claims.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.