Consensus in Psychiatric Emergencies Using the Delphi Technique
Rattachement africain : kr, mx. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elicit expert consensus on the necessary components of a seclusion room module required to accommodate and manage psychiatric emergency patients requiring both medical and surgical interventions in infectious disease situations. METHODS: A two-round Delphi survey was conducted among 38 medical professionals, architects, and spatial design experts. The survey assessed the effectiveness, feasibility, and urgency of spatial scales, spatial organization, and movement system domains related to the necessary elements of a seclusion room. RESULTS: In the spatial scale domain, items such as "sufficient width to comply with disability standards (wheelchair accessible)" and "larger space should be provided for patients with a large range of motion or requiring special medical procedures" emerged as priorities. In the movement system domain, priorities included "anticipating situations where stable patients need to be pushed on a stretcher cart from both sides, necessitating a wider passage." In the spatial organization domain, priorities included "installing interior elements (wall images, media panels, etc.) that aid patient stability, although a separate area for patients' activities reflecting psychiatric characteristics is not necessary." CONCLUSION: Expert consensus was achieved regarding the spatial scales, spatial organization, and movement system domains related to the necessary elements of a seclusion room for psychiatric emergency patients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Consensus in Psychiatric Emergencies Using the Delphi Technique
- Date Crossref
- 25/11/2024
- Éditeur
- Korean Neuropsychiatric Association
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.