The Impact of Language-Discordant Care Upon the Patient Family Experience in Pediatric Plastic Surgery

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction surveys usually overlook differences in patient family experience (PFE) for families whose spoken language is different from that of the treating physician. This study examines the relationship between language-discordant care and patient experience. METHODS: A retrospective review of deidentified pediatric plastic surgery PFE survey responses from 2018 to 2021 was performed with permission from Lurie Children's Hospital's PFE Team. RESULTS: A total of 443 pediatric plastic surgery patients were included. The race breakdown was White (49%), Other (23.9%), Black (8.8%), and Asian (5.9%). Ethnic distribution included "Not Hispanic/Latino" (58.2%) and "Hispanic/Latino" (31.4%). Languages spoken were English (80.4%), Spanish (18.1%), and Other (2.3%). Eighty-seven (19.64%) patients were language-discordant with their providers; out of this group, 68 (78.2%) preferred interpreter services. Methods of interpreter services included in-person (54.4%), over-the-phone (27.9%), video (1.5%), and no services (16.2%). The language-discordant group was less likely to give the highest ranking to "provider courtesy and respect" [odds ratio (OR)=0.200, P <0.001], "provider listened carefully" (OR=0.202, P< 0.001), and "knowing what to do with subsequent questions following visit" (OR=0.435, P< 0.01). No differences in PFE ratings existed for: "enough information provided," overall provider rating, and whether they would recommend the facility. There were no significant differences in provider ratings by interpreter service method. CONCLUSIONS: Patient/provider language discordance results in significantly lower PFE ratings in areas involving patient teaching and perceptions of provider respect, courtesy, and careful listening. This underscores the importance of providers better accommodating families with limited English proficiency.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.