Shared genetic architecture between COVID-19 and irritable bowel syndrome: a large-scale genome-wide cross-trait analysis

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: It has been reported that COVID-19 patients have an increased risk of developing IBS; however, the underlying genetic mechanisms of these associations remain largely unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate potential shared SNPs, genes, proteins, and biological pathways between COVID-19 and IBS by assessing pairwise genetic correlations and cross-trait genetic analysis. Materials and methods: We assessed the genetic correlation between three COVID-19 phenotypes and IBS using linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC) and high-definition likelihood (HDL) methods. Two different sources of IBS data were combined using METAL, and the Multi-trait analysis of GWAS (MTAG) method was applied for multi-trait analysis to enhance statistical robustness and discover new genetic associations. Independent risk loci were examined using genome-wide complex trait analysis (GCTA)-conditional and joint analysis (COJO), multi-marker analysis of genomic annotation (MAGMA), and functional mapping and annotation (FUMA), integrating various QTL information and methods to further identify risk genes and proteins. Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) was employed to compute pleiotropic gene scores, and combined with immune infiltration algorithms, IBS patients were categorized into high and low immune infiltration groups. Results: We found a positive genetic correlation between COVID-19 infection, COVID-19 hospitalization, and IBS. Subsequent multi-trait analysis identified nine significantly associated genomic loci. Among these, eight genetic variants were closely related to the comorbidity of IBS and COVID-19. The study also highlighted four genes and 231 proteins associated with the susceptibility to IBS identified through various analytical strategies and a stratification approach for IBS risk populations. Conclusions: Our study reveals a shared genetic architecture between these two diseases, providing new insights into potential biological mechanisms and laying the groundwork for more effective interventions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.