The diagnostic value of peripheral blood lymphocyte testing in children with infectious mononucleosis
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic value of peripheral blood lymphocyte testing in children with infectious mononucleosis (IM). METHODS: A total of 135 children with IM as the IM group and 100 healthy volunteers as the healthy group were included in this retrospective study. Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets marked as CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD16 + CD56+, and CD19 + in the peripheral blood were quantified using flow cytometry. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test, Kruskal-Wallis test, AUROC curve, and Kappa consistency test to assess the diagnostic value of these markers in IM. RESULTS: The AUROC curve for CD8 + cells and for CD4+/CD8 + ratios both achieved a value of 1 with the sensitivity and specificity of 100% (P<0.001). The Kappa coefficients were 1 for CD8+, CD4+/CD8 + ratios and the combined EBV analysis, indicating a 100% consistency with the clinical diagnosis. Significant differences were also observed in the CD3+, CD4+, CD16 + CD56+, and CD19 + lymphocyte subsets between the IM group and the healthy group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The evaluation of CD8 + and CD4+/CD8 + ratios in peripheral blood lymphocytes represents a significant advancement in the diagnosis of IM. Peripheral blood lymphocyte testing offers a reliable, sensitive, and specific diagnostic tool to enhance the clinical management of children with IM.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The diagnostic value of peripheral blood lymphocyte testing in children with infectious mononucleosis
- Date Crossref
- 16/11/2024
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.