A New Tool Supporting the Selection of the Best Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donor by Modelling Local Own Real-World Data
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: The selection of the best donor for each specific patient is crucial for the success of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, there is debate on the choice of the best donor when multiple suitable donors exist. METHODS: By using own data from two transplant centers, we have developed a calculator able to provide the patients' 2-year overall survival (OS) associated with each of the potential donor options during the selection process, in order to support the transplant physician during the choice. Data on 737 HSCTs with HLA-identical siblings, and unrelated or related haploidentical donors from January 2010 to July 2022 have been retrospectively obtained. RESULTS: Patients' age, disease, comorbidity index, and donor type were found to be significant variables able to predict the outcome with robustness (concordance index: 0.677). Estimates are provided within an example in the text showing outcomes with four donor options for a specific patient. CONCLUSIONS: We present the prototype of a tool supporting the selection of the best donor, guiding transplant physicians during the delicate process of donor selection before HSCT. This approach relies on real data from the centers, reflecting their local clinical experience. Improvements are underway with a larger, ongoing multicenter study.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A New Tool Supporting the Selection of the Best Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donor by Modelling Local Own Real-World Data
- Date Crossref
- 15/11/2024
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.