Evaluating Synthetic Data Generation for Domain Generalization in Fetal Brain MRI Segmentation
Rattachement africain : ch, de, gb, at. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Fetal brain tissue segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for studying neurodevelopment, but remains challenging due to data heterogeneity and limited annotations. Domain randomization (DR) has recently emerged as a promising strategy for single-source domain generalization by synthesizing training images with randomized artifacts, contrast, and resolution. In this work, we investigate how to maximize the out-of-domain (OOD) generalization of DR-based methods using FetalSynthSeg as a case study. We show that simple Gaussian mixture-based intensity modeling outperforms more complex physics-based simulations and that intensity clustering (subdividing tissue classes by intensity) substantially improves OOD robustness. Evaluated on 348 fetal subjects from four sites spanning 0.55–3T and both T1w and T2w contrasts, FetalSynthSeg reaches state-of-the-art performance on several FeTA 2024 testing datasets (80–85 Dice score) and, for the first time, offers robust segmentation on modalities other than T2w for fetal brain segmentation (80 Dice on dHCP-T1w dataset). Compared with state-of-the-art methods such as BOUNTI, nnU-Net ensemble, and the FeTA 2024 winner, FetalSynthSeg delivers comparable or superior accuracy while maintaining strong robustness across domain shifts. Our code, model weights, and Docker image ready for easy inference are available at https://hub.docker.com/r/vzalevskyi/fetalsynthseg
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evaluating Synthetic Data Generation for Domain Generalization in Fetal Brain MRI Segmentation
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2026
- Éditeur
- Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.