The association between VEGF genetic variations and the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in premature infants: a meta-analysis and systematic review
Rattachement africain : ir, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Objective Previous studies on the link between VEGF gene polymorphisms and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) have yielded inconsistent results. This meta-analysis sought to clarify the relationship between genetic variations in the VEGF gene and the risk of BPD. Methods Data were collected from multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and CNKI, up to January 5, 2024. Results Nineteen case-control studies were analyzed, featuring 1,051 BPD cases and 1,726 healthy neonates. The analysis included four studies on the −460T/C polymorphism (312 cases, 536 controls), four on the −2578C/A polymorphism (155 cases, 279 controls), six on the +405G/C polymorphism (329 cases, 385 controls), and five on the +936C/T polymorphism (225 cases, 526 controls). The meta-analysis suggests that the −460T/C polymorphism may protect against BPD (C vs. T: OR = 0.715, 95% CI 0.543–0.941, p = 0.017; CC vs. TT: OR = 0.478, 95% CI 0.233–0.983, p = 0.045; CC vs. CT + TT: OR = 0.435, 95% CI 0.248–0.764, p = 0.004). No significant associations were found between the −2578C/A, +405G/C, and +936C/T polymorphisms and BPD susceptibility. Conclusions This meta-analysis indicates that the C allele of the −460T/C polymorphism may offer protection against BPD. No significant associations were observed for the −2578C/A, +405G/C, and +936C/T polymorphisms.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The association between VEGF genetic variations and the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in premature infants: a meta-analysis and systematic review
- Date Crossref
- 14/11/2024
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.