Impact of resistant starch type 3 on fecal microbiota and stool frequency in Thai adults with chronic constipation randomized clinical trial
Rattachement africain : th, au, jp, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Constipation poses a significant health concern affecting individuals of varying ages and geographic locations worldwide. While the impacts of numerous probiotics on constipation are well-characterized, there has been limited assessment of the potential prebiotic effects of resistant starches. We therefore conducted a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled, clinical trial of resistant starch type 3 (RS-3) in Thai adults with self-reported chronic constipation. The effects of these mixed natural starch fibers on beneficial gut bacteria, bowel movements and stool consistency were evaluated after 6- and 12-week periods. Regardless of subject age, consumption of RS-3 compared to placebo resulted in significant improvements in gut health by dramatically increasing levels of beneficial bacteria (Bifidobacterium, Prevotella, Akkermansia and Megamonas) in the gut and relieving constipation. RS-3 consumption was associated with a significantly increased frequency of bowel movements, with subjects reporting these as healthy stools. Our findings provide important insights into the therapeutic advantages of RS-3 for constipation, and propose RS-3 as a feasible alternative strategy for management of constipation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Impact of resistant starch type 3 on fecal microbiota and stool frequency in Thai adults with chronic constipation randomized clinical trial
- Date Crossref
- 14/11/2024
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.