BN SO25 - Laparoscopic Management of Achalasia and Iatrogenic Mucosal Perforation in a Patient with Severe Reflux Following Multiple Therapeutic Dilatations
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Background Laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy (LHC) is the gold standard intervention for achalasia. Owing to its well-established complications of reflux symptoms, some surgeons perform an additional fundoplication surgery, although the consensus regarding the clinical benefits of this approach remains unclear.1 A meta-analysis showed that posterior fundoplication has proven to be superior to anterior fundoplication in controlling reflux symptoms.2 Method A gentleman in his 60s reported ongoing severe reflux symptoms following multiple Rigiflex ballon dilatations for achalasia, on manometry and pH studies showed features of pathological acid reflux, incomplete lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation and defective peristalsis. As shown in the video, type 1 sliding hiatus hernia, submucosal fibrosis and peri-oesophagitis were seen intraoperatively. A short cardiomyotomy was performed, which was complicated by iatrogenic oesophageal perforation. Anterior fundoplication with mucosal closure was performed. Results Following the surgery, no leak was observed on the swallow test and the patient reported a massive improvement in reflux symptoms. The addition of fundoplication to LHC in patients with achalasia and reflux symptoms has improved clinical outcomes. Conclusion Concomitant LHC and anti-reflux surgery should be considered in patients presenting with achalasia and gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- BN SO25 - Laparoscopic Management of Achalasia and Iatrogenic Mucosal Perforation in a Patient with Severe Reflux Following Multiple Therapeutic Dilatations
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2024
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.