Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 conference-abstract

EPID-13. PREDICTORS OF HISTOPATHOLOGIC RESULTS OF BRAIN BIOPSY IN PATIENTS SUSPECTED OF SECONDARY CNS LYMPHOMA

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Patients suspected of secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL) often undergo brain biopsies. Recent studies doubt biopsy utility due to high SCNSL diagnosis rates. We sought to enumerate histopathologic biopsy results in suspected SCNSL patients to evaluate utility of biopsy. We furthermore assess clinical and radiographic factors based on ability to distinguishing SCNSL from non-SCNSL. 109 patients with non-CNS lymphoma who subsequently presented with brain lesions that underwent biopsy at MD Anderson Cancer Center were included. Histopathologic diagnoses were obtained. Pre-operative imaging was assessed for contemporary radiologic diagnoses by obtaining the leading differential reported at the time of the study. Subsequently, a staff neuroradiologist, blinded to biopsy outcomes and clinical considerations, provided a retrospective diagnosis. 61 patients had SCNSL whereas 48 did not. Non-SCNSL biopsy results included infection (n=16, 33%), glioma (n=12, 25%), nonspecific (n=12, 25%), and other metastases (n=3, 6%). Patients with non-indolent lymphoma (DLBCL, mantle cell, Burkitt’s, and lymphoblastic lymphoma) were more likely to have SCNSL on biopsy (p<0.001, OR 12.55). Patients with SCNSL had shorter time interval since initial diagnosis (median 18.1mo vs. 63.2mo, p=0.008). Systemic progression of disease at biopsy was not associated with SCNSL (p=0.35). There was no difference in age, stage, LDH, Albumin, ECOG, IPI, anatomic location, or B-symptoms at times of diagnosis or neurosurgery. No patient had positive CSF cytology prior to biopsy. Neither retrospective nor contemporary radiographic diagnoses had sufficient accuracy to replace biopsy. A positive retrospective diagnosis trended towards association with SCNSL pathology (sensitivity=0.94, specificity=0.23, PPV=0.65, NPV=0.70, p=0.08). A positive contemporary diagnosis was associated with SCNSL pathology (sensitivity=0.67, specificity=0.73, PPV=0.76, NPV=0.64, p<0.001). Similar biopsy proportions yielded SCNSL and non-SCNSL. Although some factors are associated with SCNSL, none can reliably distinguish patients. Given the divergent treatments for the reported pathologies, our study reiterates the necessity of biopsy in suspected SCNSL.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
EPID-13. PREDICTORS OF HISTOPATHOLOGIC RESULTS OF BRAIN BIOPSY IN PATIENTS SUSPECTED OF SECONDARY CNS LYMPHOMA
Date Crossref
01/11/2024
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Baylor College of Medicine pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Northwestern University pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Baylor College of Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center et Northwestern University.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.