Correlation of individual SMN protein with observed efficacy in the risdiplam SMA clinical trials
Rattachement africain : ch, gb, us, it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data from risdiplam clinical studies (including infants to adults, with a body weight ≤109kg and aged ≤61 years old) were used to select dosing regimens of 0.2mg/kg for infants aged between 2-months and 2-years, 0.25mg/kg for children ≥2 years old with a body weight <20 kg, and 5mg for patients with a body weight ≥20kg. Here we assess the correlation between individual patient SMN protein level and observed efficacy. Risdiplam’s mode of action was confirmed by the shift from SMN2Δ7 mRNA to full-length mRNA. Risdiplam treatment led to a ≥2-fold median increase in SMN protein levels within 4-weeks of the start of treatment, which was maintained throughout treatment. Exposure–response analyses assessed the correlation between individual SMN protein levels and observed efficacy in pivotal studies with SMA Type 1 (FIREFISH Part 2; NCT02913482) and Types 2/3 SMA (SUNFISH Part 2; NCT02908685). Correlation-efficacy analyses were conducted using absolute SMN protein values during the study treatment period and with the change from baseline in SMN protein level obtained for each patient pre- and post-risdiplam treatment. The results of the correlation of SMN protein in blood versus the assessed efficacy endpoints of the FIREFISH and SUNFISH studies will be presented.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Correlation of individual SMN protein with observed efficacy in the risdiplam SMA clinical trials
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2024
- Éditeur
- BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.