Subcutaneous ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis: results of the phase Ib dose-finding OCARINA I study
Rattachement africain : us, ch, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Objectives OCARINA I (NCT03972306) is a Phase Ib, dose-finding study exploring a novel subcutaneous formulation for ocrelizumab relapsing and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (RMS/PPMS), every six months. Methods Adult patients with RMS/PPMS were enrolled in two groups: prior ocrelizumab treatment (A) or naïve (B) and received ascending subcutaneous doses (40,200,600,1,200mg) for safety. New patients in group A were randomised 1:1 to a single IV dose or selected SC dose and all patients from both groups could enter a subcutaneous continuation phase from week 24 up to 3 years. Results Baseline mean age was 45.7 and 39.7 years in Group A (n=53 SC;n=35 IV) and B (n=46), respectively; 72.7%/63.0% were female. Ocrelizumab SC was well-tolerated across all escalation doses. The candidate dose was 1,200mg and 920mg dose was later selected based on safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic data. Median subcutaneous treatment duration (1,200mg/920mg) was 96 weeks, with 94.7% receiving ≥3 doses. Injection site reactions were the most common adverse events (all mild/moderate). Additional safety, tolerability, immunogenicity and patient satisfaction data will be reported. Conclusions Subcutaneous ocrelizumab 920mg was selected to be investigated in the Phase III OCARINA II study. It was well-tolerated and is expected to provide similar exposure to 600mg IV.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Subcutaneous ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis: results of the phase Ib dose-finding OCARINA I study
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2024
- Éditeur
- BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.