Synthetic TCR/BCR RNA spike-in controls for assessing immune receptor profiling assay accuracy
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Synthetic TCR and BCR RNA spike-in controls can be used as universal standards to account for biases caused by PCR and NGS steps of adaptive immune receptor (AIR) repertoire profiling assays. We designed 48 BCR and 39 TCR mRNA synthetic constructs to cover nearly full-length V(D)JC structures, which represent all seven TCR (TRB, TRA, TRG, TRD) and BCR (IGH, IGK, and IGL) hypervariable chains. To identify cross-sample contamination, we spiked in 2 ul of BCR (16x3) and TCR (13x3) triplex isoform pools and detected the presence of the sequence in the sample. Furthermore, we integrated 48 BCR and 39 TCR premixed controls which are mixed in a 16:4:1 ratio into Cellecta’s DriverMap™ Adaptive Immune Receptor Profiling Assay, which employs a gene-specific, multiplex RT-PCR method with unique molecular indices (UMIs). The spike-in controls coupled with UMI-based PCR amplification can help distinguish between control and background sequences. We observed a consistent linear relationship between the concentration of spike-in controls and their molecular counts, with an average sequencing error rate between 0.4%-0.8% per base, which is in line with Illumina sequencing standards. These findings validate the effectiveness of our synthetic spike-in controls in correcting biases in AIR protocols, offering a reliable estimation of error and mutation rates in the DriverMap AIR assay or similar NGS-based immune receptor profiling methods.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Synthetic TCR/BCR RNA spike-in controls for assessing immune receptor profiling assay accuracy
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2024
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Cellecta (United States) pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
Cellecta (United States).
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.