Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 article

Comparative efficacy of ciprofol and propofol in reducing respiratory depression during ERCP anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

7Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Propofol is one of the important drug causes of respiratory depression in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) anesthesia. This study aims to clarify whether Ciprofol in ERCP anesthesia reduces the respiratory depression rate. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial performed at the Surgical Endoscopy Center, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University between Jun 01, 2022 and Feb 20, 2024, patients undergoing ERCP anesthesia were randomly assigned into ciprofol (study group) or propofol (control group). Primary outcomes included respiratory depression rate during anesthesia, and secondary outcomes included body movement and hypoxemia, awakening time, mean arterial pressure and heart rate changes at key points during surgery. RESULTS: 20 of the 306 patients had respiratory depression (6.5%). The frequency of respiratory depression was 3.3% in the group C and 9.8% in the group P, with a difference of 6.5% between the two groups (P = 0.035). Ciprofol anesthesia decreased the hyoxemia, injection pain, and circulation and heart rate fluctuations. Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that Propofol (OR 1.970; 95% CI, 1.121-3.461, P = 0.018), mallampati classification>II (OR 1.594; 95% CI, 1.129-2.249, P = 0.008), and fasting time>10.5 h (OR 3.184; 95% CI, 1.531-6.621, P = 0.002) were independent risk factors for incidence of respiratory depression in ERCP anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing anesthesia for ERCP, Ciprofol, compared to Propofol, has been shown to effectively reduce the incidence of intraoperative respiratory depression, thereby enhancing the safety of the anesthesia process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 15/01/2022 (ChiCTR2200055629).

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comparative efficacy of ciprofol and propofol in reducing respiratory depression during ERCP anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
Date Crossref
08/11/2024
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Anesthesia and Sedative AgentsAirway Management and Intubation TechniquesRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.