Clinical outcomes of pediatric kidney replacement therapy after childhood cancer—An ESPN/ERA Registry study
Rattachement africain : fi, nl, fr, it, tr, gb, ch, hu, pt, be, pl, de, ua, no, cz, dk, ru, at, es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Cancer and its treatment may lead to kidney injury and the need for kidney replacement therapy (KRT). We identified 287 pediatric KRT patients with a history of malignancy from the European Society for Paediatric Nephrology/European Renal Association Registry. Of these, 197 had cancer as a primary cause of KRT (group 1) and 90 had a malignancy diagnosis before KRT (group 2). Two matched controls without malignancy were randomly selected for each patient. Data were complemented with a questionnaire. Median time to kidney transplantation (KT) from KRT initiation was 2.4 (IQR: 1.5-4.7), 1.5 (IQR: 0.4-3.3), 3.6 (IQR: 1.3 to Q3 not reached), and 1.1 (IQR: 0.3-3.6) years for group 1, their controls, group 2, and their controls, respectively. Overall 10-year mortality for those on KRT was higher among cancer patients vs controls in group 1: 16% vs 9% (adjusted hazard ratio 2.02, 95% CI: 1.21-3.37) and in group 2: 23% vs 14% (adjusted hazard ratio 2.32, 95% CI: 1.11-4.85). In contrast, 10-year patient survival after the first KT was comparable to controls (93% vs 96%; 100% vs 94%, in groups 1 and 2, respectively). In summary, childhood cancer survivors' KT was delayed, and their overall mortality when on KRT was increased, but once transplanted, their long-term outcome was similar to other KT recipients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Clinical outcomes of pediatric kidney replacement therapy after childhood cancer—An ESPN/ERA Registry study
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.