Res@LDH: A Novel Nanohybrid Therapeutic for Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury with Dual Reactive Oxygen Species Scavenging Efficiency
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Ischemic stroke poses a global health challenge, necessitating effective therapeutic interventions given the limited time window for thrombolytic therapy. Here, we present Res@LDH, a novel nanohybrid therapeutic agent boasting a dual reactive oxygen species scavenging efficiency of approximately 90%. Comprising Ge-containing layered double hydroxide nanosheets (Ge-LDH) as a drug nanocarrier and resveratrol as a neuroprotective agent, Res@LDH demonstrates enhanced permeability across the blood–brain barrier, ensuring high biocompatibility and stability. We explored the potential of Res@LDH in mitigating oxidative stress injury induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion and reperfusion in mice, as well as H 2 O 2 -induced cytotoxicity in HT22 cells. Our experiments unveil Res@LDH’s capacity to ameliorate neurological deficits, reduce the infarction volume, mitigate blood–brain barrier disruption, exhibit a robust antioxidant activity, and dampen the release of proinflammatory cytokines. Moreover, Res@LDH treatment markedly attenuates microglial and astrocytic activation. Leveraging a pioneering synthetic approach harnessing Ge-LDH and resveratrol, Res@LDH emerges as a promising strategy for addressing ischemia–reperfusion injury, offering a concise solution to current therapeutic challenges.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Res@LDH: A Novel Nanohybrid Therapeutic for Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury with Dual Reactive Oxygen Species Scavenging Efficiency
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2024
- Éditeur
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.