An umbrella analysis assessing the risk of acute kidney injury in COVID-19 patients

Le résumé fourni par la source

A number of research studies have indicated a potential association between COVID-19 and acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the methodologies employed and the risk estimates derived from these studies vary. Therefore, an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses was conducted to determine the incidence of AKI in COVID-19 patients and AKI-associated mortality. A complete literature search was undertaken in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. The methodological rigor of the included papers was evaluated using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2) instrument. The pooled risk ratio (RR) and odds ratio (OR) of the included studies were calculated to establish the strength of the association between AKI cases and COVID-19 infections. This umbrella review included 20 studies. Two of the 20 studies assessed adult COVID-19 patient risk factors for AKI, 1 examined survival rates and 7 examined the incidence of AKI. The remaining 10 investigations revealed that patients with coronavirus were susceptible to AKI. The umbrella analysis comprised reviews that contained a range of 6 to 54 papers. The AMSTAR-2 ratings yielded a total of 14 studies deemed to be of high quality, with 6 studies classified as intermediate quality. Statistical analysis of included reviews revealed a 1.50 RR for AKI incidence in COVID-19 patients (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.40-1.60, I2 69%, p < 0.0001) and a 2.02 RR (95% CI: 1.79-2.29, I2 56%, p < 0.0001) for AKI-associated death. This umbrella review revealed that individuals infected with the novel coronavirus often develop AKI. SARS-CoV-2 infections were associated with AKI due to advanced age, male gender, coronary artery disease, diabetes, and hypertension. However, AKI and a renal replacement therapy (RRT) requirement independently predicted unfavorable COVID-19 results.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.