Treatable traits and personalised management of moderate-severe asthma: implications for reliever use, symptom control and exacerbation risk
Résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Patient characteristics affect symptom control, reliever medication (Rmed) use and exacerbation risk in asthma, but the overall impact of these potentially treatable traits is poorly understood. Aim: To evaluate how regular treatment (with fluticasone propionate [FP] monotherapy, FP-salmeterol [FP/SAL], or budesonide-formoterol [BUD/FOR]) affects personalised management of moderate-severe asthma. Methods: Simulation scenarios used models previously developed from pooled clinical trial data. Individual Rmed use patterns, symptom control levels (ACQ-5) and time to first exacerbation were predicted over 1 year. Switching patients with poor control from FP to FP/SAL or BUD/FOR was assessed, and treatment differences were tested for each endpoint. Results: Stepping up FP to FP/SAL or BUD/FOR led to significant reductions in Rmed use. Improvement in symptoms and decrease in Rmed use was less in patients with asthma history >10 years, higher baseline ACQ-5, obesity and in smokers. These patients had greater reductions in Rmed use and lower exacerbation risks with FP/SAL relative to BUD/FOR (p<0.01 for all comparisons; Figure 1). Conclusions: Treatment choice and patient baseline characteristics contribute to significant differences in immediate and long-term response. These findings support personalised management. Funding: GSK (ID 215310). erj;64/suppl_68/PA1181/F1 F1 F1
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Treatable traits and personalised management of moderate-severe asthma: implications for reliever use, symptom control and exacerbation risk
- Date Crossref
- 14/09/2024
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.