Prognostic value of follow-up cardiopulmonary exercise testing in pulmonary arterial hypertension
Résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Current guidelines recommend a four-strata model based on World Health Organization functional class (WHO-FC), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) for risk stratification in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) during follow-up (Humbert et al Eur Resp J 2023). Aims: To explore the clinical relevance of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) as the exercise parameter in place of 6MWD at first reassessment after treatment in PAH. Methods: Incident treatment-naïve patients with idiopathic, heritable, drug/toxins-induced, and connective tissue disease-associated PAH were analysed at first follow-up. Cox regression models were used to identify CPET parameters associated with survival. A composite CPET score was derived by averaging risk scores for each prognostic CPET variable. Transplant-free survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier analyses. Results: 262 patients were included. The final CPET score included peak oxygen uptake, the slope relating minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production, and peak oxygen pulse. The four-strata model based on WHO-FC, BNP, and CPET score predicted survival at the time of the first re-evaluation, with better accuracy than the model including 6MWD (c-index 0.81 vs 0.71, p<0.001). Conclusions: A simplified four-strata risk assessment tool incorporating the CPET score accurately predicted survival at follow-up in PAH erj;64/suppl_68/PA2494/F1 F1 F1
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prognostic value of follow-up cardiopulmonary exercise testing in pulmonary arterial hypertension
- Date Crossref
- 14/09/2024
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.