Milder ILD with preserved lung function significantly contributes to respiratory caused mortality in SSc
Rattachement africain : no, ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: While there is excess mortality in systemic sclerosis (SSc) associated ILD with FVC% predicted <70%, risk in less severe ILD is less clear. Objective: To evaluate respiratory-caused mortality in SSc-patients with FVC ≥70%. Methods: We assessed characteristics associated with respiratory and non-respiratory causes of death in a prospective SSc-ILD cohort including 323 Norwegian patients. The severity of ILD was defined as FVC% predicted ≥/<70%, extent of ILD on HRCT</≥10%, and by respiratory symptoms (functional class ≤/> 2). Results: Respiratory causes of death were observed in 24/99 deceased patients. Of 24 patients dying of respiratory cause, 67% died of respiratory tract infections and 33% from respiratory failure. Mean 1.1 year prior to death, these 24 SSc-ILD patients had 12 (50%) FVC ≥70%, 57% had ≤10% extent of ILD, and 44% had functional class ≤ 2. Compared to 104 surviving patients with FVC ≥70% were more often older, male, had progressive ILD, presence of respiratory symptoms, reduced six-minute walking distance, and pulmonary hypertension. Conclusion: Respiratory causes of death were common among SSc-ILD patients with preserved lung function. This finding highlights the importance of up-front measures to halt disease progression, even in cases with apparently mild ILD phenotypes. erj;64/suppl_68/PA4271/F1 F1 F1
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Milder ILD with preserved lung function significantly contributes to respiratory caused mortality in SSc
- Date Crossref
- 14/09/2024
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.