NEWTON study: an interim assessment on asthma control in Europe
Rattachement africain : it, de, es, fr, hu. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: To provide an interim analysis of asthma control level in the NEWTON population assessed with the 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5, scores: 0 [totally controlled], 6 [extremely poorly controlled]) after 3 and 6 months from starting the treatment with beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate (BDP/F) 100/6 µg dry powder inhaler via NEXThaler®. METHODS: NEWTON is a multinational (DE, ES, FR, HU, IT, RO), 6-month observational study aimed to estimate the proportion of patients improving their asthma control (with ACQ-5 score) in 650 not adequately controlled asthmatics receiving extrafine BDP/FF 100/6 µg via NEXThaler® as both maintenance and as maintenance and reliever therapy (MART). RESULTS: In total 345 patients were evaluated for this analysis. Of these 345 patients, 68.4% received MART and 31.6% maintenance treatment only. Respectively, 328 and 247 patients completed the ACQ-5 at 3 and 6-month visits. Improvement of asthma control was reached in 62.8% (n=206) and 69.2% (n=171) of patients after 3 and 6 months of treatment, respectively. After 6 months, 74.5% (n=184) of the patients achieved a minimal clinically important improvement in ACQ-5 score. CONCLUSIONS: These results show a significant improvement in the control of asthma symptoms after 3 and 6 months of treatment with extrafine BDP/FF 100/6 µg via NEXThaler®. erj;64/suppl_68/PA4500/F1 F1 F1
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- NEWTON study: an interim assessment on asthma control in Europe
- Date Crossref
- 14/09/2024
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.