Incidence, one-year progression and factors associated with respiratory muscle weakness after discharge from ICU for COVID-19
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: After a stay in the intensive care unit for COVID-19, some patients have persistent symptoms and lung function abnormalities. Hypothesis: These defects may be related to inspiratory muscle weakness (IMW). Methods: Pulmonary function tests were performed at 3, 6 and 12 months after onset of symptoms, in patients admitted to ICU for COVID-19, and included exploration of respiratory muscles with maximal inspiratory pressure and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure measurement. The primary endpoint was incidence of IMW at 3 months. Secondary endpoints were factors associated with IMW and its evolution at 6 and 12 months. Results: 85 patients were included at 3 months. At 6 and 12 months, 80 and 73 completed the follow-up. Eighty-six percent received mechanical ventilation during ICU stay. The incidence of weakness was 21% at 3 months, 13% at 6 and 5% at 12 months. Older age, a hospital stay > 44 days, ICU stay > 17 days, use of neuromuscular blockers > 8 days, prone position sessions > 7 and duration of mechanical ventilation were factors associated with IMW. erj;64/suppl_68/PA5272/F1 F1 F1 Figure 1. Changes in inspiratory muscle strength following severe SARS-CoV-2 infection Conclusion: IMW persisted in many patients after hospitalization in ICU, possibly explaining dyspnoea. It was associated with the duration of mechanical ventilation and the length of ICU stay. It improved at 6 and 12 months, as well as dyspnoea.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Incidence, one-year progression and factors associated with respiratory muscle weakness after discharge from ICU for COVID-19
- Date Crossref
- 14/09/2024
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.