Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 preprint

From a genomic risk model to clinical trial implementation in a learning health system: the ProGRESS Study

3Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
72Institutions déclarées
13Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, gb, no, au, fr, pl, ca, my, de, dk, se, fi, es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

ABSTRACT Background As healthcare moves from a one-size-fits-all approach towards precision care, individual risk prediction is an important step in disease prevention and early detection. Biobank-linked healthcare systems can generate knowledge about genomic risk and test the impact of implementing that knowledge in care. Risk-stratified prostate cancer screening is one clinical application that might benefit from such an approach. Methods We developed a clinical translation pipeline for genomics-informed prostate cancer screening in a national healthcare system. We used data from 585,418 male participants of the Veterans Affairs (VA) Million Veteran Program (MVP), among whom 101,920 self-identify as Black/African-American, to develop and validate the Prostate CAncer integrated Risk Evaluation (P-CARE) model, a prostate cancer risk prediction model based on a polygenic score, family history, and genetic principal components. The model was externally validated in data from 18,457 PRACTICAL Consortium participants. A novel blended genome-exome (BGE) platform was used to develop a clinical laboratory assay for both the P-CARE model and rare variants in prostate cancer-associated genes, including additional validation in 74,331 samples from the All of Us Research Program. Results In overall and ancestry-stratified analyses, the polygenic score of 601 variants was associated with any, metastatic, and fatal prostate cancer in MVP and PRACTICAL. Values of the P-CARE model at ≥80th percentile in the multiancestry cohort overall were associated with hazard ratios (HR) of 2.75 (95% CI 2.66-2.84), 2.78 (95% CI 2.54-2.99), and 2.59 (95% CI 2.22-2.97) for any, metastatic, and fatal prostate cancer in MVP, respectively, compared to the median. When high– and low-risk groups were defined as P-CARE HR>1.5 and HR<0.75 for metastatic prostate cancer, the 220,062 (37.6%) high-risk vs.146,826 (25.1%) low-risk participants in MVP had a 47.9% vs. 14.1%, 9.3% vs. 2.0%, and 3.6% vs. 0.8% cumulative cause-specific incidence of any, metastatic, and fatal prostate cancer by age 90, respectively. The clinical assay and reports are now being implemented in a clinical trial of precision prostate cancer screening in the VA healthcare system (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05926102 ). Conclusions A model consisting of a polygenic score, family history, and genetic principal components describes a clinically important gradient of prostate cancer risk in a diverse patient population and demonstrates the potential of learning health systems to implement and evaluate precision health care approaches.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
From a genomic risk model to clinical trial implementation in a learning health system: the ProGRESS Study
Date Crossref
04/11/2024
Éditeur
openRxiv
Type
posted-content

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Brigham and Women's HospitalHarvard UniversityVA Boston Healthcare SystemUniversity of California San DiegoVA San Diego Healthcare SystemBroad InstituteUniversity of California, Los AngelesVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare SystemVA Salt Lake City Healthcare SystemPhiladelphia VA Medical CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaUniversity of UtahUniversity of BristolUniversity of OxfordUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of CambridgeCancer Research UKCancer Research UK Cambridge CenterOslo University HospitalUniversity of OsloTranslational Research InstituteQueensland University of TechnologyChris O’Brien LifehouseProstate Cancer ResearchCentre for Cancer BiologyMonash UniversityThe University of AdelaideUniversité Sorbonne NouvelleSorbonne UniversitéHôpital TenonInternational Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversityRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustInstitute of Cancer ResearchUniversity of Tennessee Health Science CenterUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of MalayaQueen Mary University of LondonThe University of MelbourneCancer Council VictoriaUniversität UlmPraxis für Humangenetik TübingenPraxis für HumangenetikInsermÉcole des Hautes Études en Santé PubliqueInstitut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et TravailUniversité de RennesCity of HopeBeckman Research InstituteUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen University HospitalGentofte HospitalInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité de MontréalMoffitt Cancer CenterUniformed Services University of the Health SciencesKarolinska InstitutetIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiUniversity of TurkuTurku University HospitalAarhus UniversityAarhus University HospitalFundación Pública Galega de Medicina XenómicaInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria de SantiagoInstituto de Investigación de Enfermedades RarasManchester Academic Health Science CentreUniversity of ManchesterThe Christie HospitalThe Christie NHS Foundation TrustVanderbilt University Medical CenterLa Jolla Bioengineering Institute

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.