Takotsubo syndrome induced by de novo left bundle branch area pacing: a case report
Rattachement africain : gb, th. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Takotsubo syndrome (TS), traditionally associated with emotional or physical stressors, manifests as transient left ventricular (LV) abnormalities mimicking acute coronary syndrome. Surgical procedures, such as pacemaker implantation, have emerged as potential TS triggers. Conduction system pacing (CSP), including His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), is a novel technique utilizing the heart's intrinsic conduction system. Despite documented cases of TS post-pacemaker implantation, the literature exploring the association between CSP and TS remains sparse. Case summary: LBBAP procedure was followed by post-procedural dizziness and dyspnoea. An initial transthoracic echocardiography revealed moderate-severe LV dysfunction, accompanied by elevated troponin levels. Coronary angiography showed unobstructed coronary arteries, while left ventriculography exhibited a classic apical ballooning. The patient had a favourable recovery, with LV function improvement noted before discharge. Discussion: Takotsubo syndrome may be triggered by other non-traditional physical stressors including traditional RV pacing and LBBAP. Clinicians should be aware of this potential, albeit rare, complication of LBBAP to ensure timely recognition and management. Increased awareness is vital for optimizing patient care during CSP procedures.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Takotsubo syndrome induced by <i>de novo</i> left bundle branch area pacing: a case report
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2024
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.