Molecular dynamic simulations of displacement cascades in molybdenum and molybdenum-rhenium alloys
Le résumé fourni par la source
Molybdenum-Rhenium (Mo-Re) alloys are considered core materials for advanced nuclear reactor components due to their excellent mechanical properties, machinability, and resistance to irradiation damage. However, irradiation-induced embrittlement and phase precipitation at high temperatures, along with transmutation nuclides, have hindered their broader application. To address this, we developed a Mo-Re interatomic potential using the Finnis-Sinclair formalism, facilitating molecular dynamics simulations to study primary irradiation damage. Systemically primary irradiation damage simulations for Mo and Mo-Re alloys have been performed. It’s found that there were more Frenkel-pair defects produced during the stage of thermal spike in Mo-Re alloys but fewer defects survived at the end of the cascade compared to Mo. In addition, the number of large-size interstitial clusters and dislocation loops was higher in Mo-Re alloys than in pure Mo with the same PKA energy. This is mainly attributed to the fact that Mo-Re alloys have lower thermal conductivity, while the binding energies of interstitial clusters and dislocation loops with sizes less than 100 in Mo-Re alloys are comparable to those of pure Mo, resulting in higher defect composites and larger defect sizes in Mo-Re alloys. These findings provide valuable insights into the primary damage mechanisms in Mo-Re alloys under irradiation, offering a foundation for developing kinetic models to simulate radiation-induced microstructural evolution.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Molecular dynamic simulations of displacement cascades in molybdenum and molybdenum-rhenium alloys
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2024
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.