Aller au contenu principal
2024 conference-abstract

S93 Phase 3 NOTUS trial: dupilumab efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and type 2 inflammation

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
11Institutions déclarées
4Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, de, gb, it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction Patients with type 2 inflammation in COPD suffer from frequent exacerbations and high symptom burden. Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation. The second pivotal phase 3 NOTUS (NCT04456673) trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with COPD and type 2 inflammation. Methods The NOTUS trial was a 52-week phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of efficacy and safety of subcutaneous add-on dupilumab 300 mg q2w or placebo. Enrolled patients had COPD with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation and type 2 inflammation (blood eosinophils ≥300 cells/μL at screening) and were on triple therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), long-acting β2-agonists (LABA), and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) (or LABA/LAMA if ICS was contraindicated). Primary analysis was performed on interim data, with 92% information fraction for the primary endpoint (annualized rate of moderate or severe exacerbations). Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at Weeks 12 and 52, change from baseline in St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, exacerbation-associated annualized total systemic corticosteroid (SCS) courses, and safety. Results Participants (N=935) were randomized to placebo (n=465) or dupilumab (n=470). Compared with placebo, dupilumab reduced the annualized rate of moderate or severe exacerbations by 34% (relative risk vs placebo [95% confidence interval {CI}] 0.66 [0.54–0.82], P<0.001). Over the 52-week period, adjusted annualized total exacerbation-associated SCS courses were reduced by 39% in patients receiving dupilumab (relative risk vs placebo [95% CI] 0.61 [0.47–0.80], nominal P<0.001). At Week 12, dupilumab significantly increased pre-BD FEV1 (least-squares [LS] mean difference 82 mL, P<0.001) compared with placebo, and this was maintained at Week 52 (LS mean difference 62 mL, P=0.018). Dupilumab improved SGRQ total score at Week 52 (LS mean difference −3.37, nominal P=0.007) vs placebo. Safety findings were similar to BOREAS and treatment-emergent adverse events were balanced between groups. Conclusions Dupilumab significantly reduced moderate or severe exacerbations, decreased SCS exposure, and improved lung function, in patients with COPD and type 2 inflammation in 2 phase 3 trials.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
S93 Phase 3 NOTUS trial: dupilumab efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and type 2 inflammation
Date Crossref
01/11/2024
Éditeur
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society
Type
proceedings-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchIL-33, ST2, and ILC PathwaysAsthma and respiratory diseases

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.