Interval Mean Estimation Under (ε,δ)-Local Differential Privacy
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Local differential privacy (LDP) techniques obviate the need for trust in the data collector, as they provide robust privacy guarantees against untrusted data managers while simultaneously preserving the accuracy of statistical information derived from the privatized data. As a result, these methods have garnered considerable interest and research efforts. In particular,$(\varepsilon,\delta)$-LDP schemes have been utilized across a range of statistical tasks. Nonetheless, existing$(\varepsilon,\delta)$-LDP mechanisms for mean estimation suffer from challenges such as elevated estimation errors and diminished data utility. To address this problem, we propose two novel$(\varepsilon,\delta)$-LDP algorithms for mean estimation. Specifically, we design a one-dimensional piecewise mean estimation algorithm, which perturbs the input data into intervals, thereby reducing noise addition and enhancing both accuracy and efficiency. Building on this foundation, we extend our approach to multi-dimensional data, resulting in a multi-dimensional piecewise mean estimation algorithm. Furthermore, we conduct a theoretical analysis to derive both the variance and error bounds for the proposed algorithms. Extensive experiments conducted on real datasets demonstrate the high practicality of our algorithms for data statistical tasks, showing significant improvements in data utility.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Interval Mean Estimation Under (ε,δ)-Local Differential Privacy
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.