Investigation of fiber Bragg grating sensor measurability in concrete beams under static load conditions
Résumé fourni par la source
Recent advances in construction materials and architecture have enhanced the safety of modern structures, which now feature higher, lighter, and more unique designs. Bridges, as critical infrastructure, face increasing load demands due to rising traffic volumes, leading to accelerated structural deterioration. This necessitates more frequent inspections and maintenance, resulting in increased costs and potential operational disruptions. Real-time built-in monitoring systems are thus essential for both new and aging structures. Fiber Optic Sensor (FOS) technology, particularly Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors, offers a reliable and stable solution for long-term Structural Health Monitoring (SHM). This study evaluates the performance and applicability of FBG sensors (FBGs) in comparison to traditional strain gauges (SGs) for capturing strains, loads, deflections, and temperature in full-scale beams under static loads. Four large-scale reinforced concrete (RC) and CFRP-strengthened beams were tested. Nonlinear finite element analysis (NLFEA) using VecTor2 was employed to simulate the behavior of these beams under static loading. Data from FBGs were compared to those from collocated electrical SGs. The results demonstrated the reliability and flexibility of FBGs in monitoring structural performance. Notably, FBGs continued to provide accurate readings even after the specimens reached their maximum load, showcasing their endurance and resilience compared to conventional SGs.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Investigation of fiber Bragg grating sensor measurability in concrete beams under static load conditions
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2024
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.