Expert Panel Consensus for Optimizing Outcomes in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the Context of Suboptimal Response to a Biosimilar: The Role of Aflibercept

Le résumé fourni par la source

Purpose: The inclusion of ranibizumab biosimilars into National Health Service England commissioning recommendations published in 2022 created a need for expert guidance to optimize treatment outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) who otherwise may not have received first-line ranibizumab. This article provides a consensus treatment pathway supporting timely identification and management of a suboptimal response to these therapies, thereby aiming to facilitate clinically meaningful outcomes and efficient management of service capacity under specific circumstances where ranibizumab biosimilars may be initiated as a first-line treatment. Methods: Two structured round-table meetings of UK medical retina specialists were held in person and virtually on September 22 and November 3, 2022, respectively. These meetings were organized and funded by Bayer. Results: The panel provided guidance on the implementation of an early treatment optimization pathway in cases where ranibizumab biosimilars are used as a first-line treatment, including recommendations on patient suitability and capacity requirements, and criteria for identification and strategies for management of a suboptimal response. The panel discussed the role of aflibercept treatment and its potential benefits and outlined recommendations on switching ranibizumab biosimilar suboptimal responders to an aflibercept treat-and-extend regimen, where appropriate. Conclusion: Developed by a retinal expert panel, this early treatment optimization pathway provides guidance to facilitate optimal long-term patient outcomes while addressing capacity and resourcing constraints in circumstances of first-line ranibizumab biosimilar use for nAMD, including how aflibercept may be used in cases with a suboptimal response. Therefore, this fills an important gap in guidance on navigating the new treatment landscape.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.