Prediction of Turfgrass Quality Using Multispectral UAV Imagery and Ordinal Forests: Validation Using a Fuzzy Approach
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Protocols to evaluate turfgrass quality rely on visual ratings that, depending on the rater’s expertise, can be subjective and susceptible to positive and negative drifts. We developed seasonal (spring, summer and fall) as well as inter-seasonal machine learning predictive models of turfgrass quality using multispectral and thermal imagery collected using unmanned aerial vehicles for two years as a proof-of-concept. We chose ordinal regression to develop the models instead of conventional classification to account for the ranked nature of the turfgrass quality assessments. We implemented a fuzzy correction of the resulting confusion matrices to ameliorate the probable drift of the field-based visual ratings. The best seasonal predictions were rendered by the fall (multi-class AUC: 0.774, original kappa 0.139, corrected kappa: 0.707) model. However, the best overall predictions were obtained when observation across seasons and years were used for model fitting (multi-class AUC: 0.872, original kappa 0.365, corrected kappa: 0.872), clearly highlighting the need to integrate inter-seasonal variability to enhance models’ accuracies. Vegetation indices such as the NDVI, GNDVI, RVI, CGI and the thermal band can render as much information as a full array of predictors. Our protocol for modeling turfgrass quality can be followed to develop a library of predictive models that can be used in different settings where turfgrass quality ratings are needed.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prediction of Turfgrass Quality Using Multispectral UAV Imagery and Ordinal Forests: Validation Using a Fuzzy Approach
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2024
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Agricultural Research Service pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
United States Department of Agriculture pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
Utah State University Soils and Climate Department pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Forage and Range Research Laboratory pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture et Soils and Climate Department — Utah State University, avec 1 autre affiliation.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.