Is there a gender difference in the effects of cardiovascular risk factors on the anatomical localization and severity of obstruction on coronary arteries?

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Whether there is a gender difference in the effects of traditional cardiovascular risk factors(CVRF) on the anatomical localization(AL) and severity(AS) of obstruction on coronary arteries(CA) remains unclear. Purpose In our study, we investigated whether there is a gender difference in the relationship between CVRF and obstruction on CA . Methods We included 978 patients(49.9% women, mean age: 61+10.3) with stable chest pain undergoing invasive coronary angiography between 2019-2021 who were recruited from the database of our clinic. We examined the gender difference in hypertension(HT), diabetes mellitus(DM), smoking, hyperlipidemia, previous history of CAD(H.CAD) and family history of premature CAD(F.CAD) and their correlation with the AL and AS of obstruction on CA in both gender. Results Women were older(p<0.001) with higher rates of HT (p=0.001) and DM(p=0.026) and higher TC, LDLC and HDLC levels respectively (rs) as (p=0.001, p=0.001, p=0.001). Whereas H.CAD and smoking rates were higher in men rs as (p=0.001, p=0.009). The incidence of critical stenosis (≥70 obstruction) & intermediate lesions (50-69%) on all CA and Syntax scores were higher in men(p<0,01). In patients with HT, severe CAD was more prominent on circumflex (Cx)(p=0.029) and right coronary artery(RCA)(p=0.002) in women and on the proximal ( p=0.024) and mid portion of left anterior descending artery(LAD) (p=0.045) in men. In patients with DM a statistically significant(ss) correlation was found between the presence of DM and AS in all vessels except for left main coronary artery (LMCA) in women (LAD prox:p=0.001; LAD mid:p=0.001; diagonal artery(Dg):p=0.003; Cx:p=0.001; RCA:p=0.001 ;LMCA:p>0.05). However no such correlation was observed in men(p>0.05). In patients with H.CAD moderate/severe lesions were more common on proximal(p=0.013) and mid portions of LAD(p=0.021), on CX( p=0.006) and on RCA(p=0.016) in men and more common on the proximal portion of LAD(p=0.047), CX(p=0.014) and RCA(p=0.009) in women. For either smoking and F.CAD there was no such correlation in either gender (p>0,05). As for blood lipid levels no correlation was observed between LDLC, HDLC and triglyceride levels and AL&AS in men(p>0,05). However there was a negative, weak correlation between the HDLC levels and obstruction on LAD mid portion(r=-0.140; p=0.003); on Dg(r=-0.100; p=0.034) on CX (r=-0.154; p=0.001) and on RCA (r=-0.151; p=0.001) in women. Conclusion Major traditional CVRFs have a sex specific impact on AL and AS of obstruction on CA. In the era of precisıon medicine we need gender specific risk scoring systems taking these gender differences into account.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.