Conduction system pacing and atrioventricular node ablation for atrial fibrillation - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background/Introduction Biventricular pacing (BVP) has been shown to reduce the risk of heart failure following atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) for the management of medically refractory atrial fibrillation (AF) when compared with conventional right ventricular pacing.[1] Conduction system pacing (CSP) is an emerging cardiac synchronization alternative to BVP[2], however, its evidence in AVNA for AF is limited. Purpose To evaluate the effect of CSP on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), QRS duration (QRSd), pacing threshold and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class score following AVNA for AF. Methods We conducted a literature review of PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating CSP (His bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing) post AVNA for AF. Out of 14 studies comprising 1112 patients, we conducted meta-analyses evaluating the impact of CSP on LVEF and QRS. Ten studies were pooled to assess outcomes pre- and post-implantation of CSP following AVNA. Three observational studies and one RCT were included in the meta-analysis comparing outcomes in CSP versus BVP post AVNA. Results CSP resulted in a significant QRSd reduction (-11.01 ms, 95% CI 5.07 - 16.95, p <0.01), improved LVEF (+10.28%, 95% CI 7.03 - 13.52; p <0.01) and improved NYHA score (-1.09; 95% CI -1.41 - -0.78; p <0.01) during follow-up of 6-36 months (Figure 1) from baseline (peri-implantation). There was no significant pacing threshold rise (0.11V; 95% CI -0.14 - 0.36; p= 0.39) observed during the same period. CSP was associated with statistically significant shorter QRSd (-49.81ms; 95% CI, -70.57 - -29.06; p <0.01) when compared to BVP. For LVEF, there was a statistically significant improvement of +8.96% (95% CI 2.55 - 15.37%; p <0.01) with CSP versus BVP. Limited data prohibited comparison of threshold and NYHA outcomes between CSP and BVP. Conclusion Conduction system pacing appears effective in improving baseline LVEF, QRSd and NYHA score in AVNA for AF, and may be a viable alternative to further optimising LVEF and QRSd in comparison to BVP. Further studies are required to evaluate the long-term impact and clinical outcomes of CSP in post AVNA patients.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.