Clinical Performance of the LiquidArray® Gastrointestinal VER 1.0 Assay in Patients with Suspected Gastroenteritis
Résumé fourni par la source
Background/Objectives: Rapid and accurate pathogen identification is essential for the proper management of patients with infectious gastroenteritis, as well as for a better control of disease outbreaks. This observational, non-interventional, single-site study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of LiquidArray® Gastrointestinal VER 1.0, a multiplex PCR syndromic panel capable of detecting up to 26 clinically relevant enteropathogens. Methods: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and likelihood ratio (LR) were evaluated using stool samples from 1512 patients with suspected gastroenteritis and were compared to seven competitor assays. Results: LiquidArray® Gastrointestinal VER 1.0 showed a very low invalid rate (0.5% at initial testing, down to 0% after repeat) and high sensitivity (>90% for most detected targets) and specificity (>99% for all detected targets). Accordingly, the PPV and NPV were high (>90% for most targets and >99% for all targets, respectively). The analytical performance of LiquidArray® Gastrointestinal VER 1.0 was also excellent as to co-amplification capability, cross-reactivity and assay precision. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the excellent clinical performance of LiquidArray® Gastrointestinal VER 1.0 and its suitability for implementation in clinical routine for the rapid and accurate diagnosis of infectious gastroenteritis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Clinical Performance of the LiquidArray® Gastrointestinal VER 1.0 Assay in Patients with Suspected Gastroenteritis
- Date Crossref
- 25/10/2024
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.