Natural variation in chalcone isomerase defines a major locus controlling radial stem growth variation among Populus nigra populations
Rattachement africain : fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
A bstract Poplar is a promising resource for wood production and the development of lignocel-lulosic biomass, but currently available varieties have not been optimized for these purposes. Therefore, it is critical to investigate the genetic variability and mechanisms underlying traits that affect biomass yield. Previous studies have shown that target traits in different poplar species are complex, with a small number of genetic factors having relatively low effects compared to medium to high heritability. In this study, a systems biology approach was implemented, combining genomic, transcriptomic, and phenotypic information from a large collection of individuals from natural populations of black poplar from Western Europe. Such an approach identified a QTL and a gene, coding for chalcone isomerase (CHI), as a candidate for controlling radial growth. Additionally, analysis of the structure and diversity of traits as well as CHI gene expression revealed a high allelic fixation index, linked to the geographical origin of the natural populations under study. These findings provide insights into how adaptive traits arise, are selected, and maintained in the populations. Overall, this study contributes to enhancing the use of poplar as a valuable resource for sustainable biomass production.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Natural variation in chalcone isomerase defines a major locus controlling radial stem growth variation among <i>Populus nigra</i> populations
- Date Crossref
- 24/10/2024
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.